Given that there won't appear to be any "official" Load Data out there for this Load, can a few of you offer a starting point with this combination and matters to consider when Performing this Load up?
Obviously, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of different ton figures, but I feel I understand why. It is a litigation-driven entire world, and many idiot would surely deduce that he could mix H380 and H110 and think of his individual custom made mixture of powder. What a planet.
The most obvious cause is really a tough/ruff bore. No volume of copper fouling lowering brokers inside the powder will proper this.
243, and a few of the loads I've began with consist of, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am likely to shoot the IMR7828 loads first, followed by the W780 loads just so there will not be any surprises once the H-4831sc loads exhibit a shotgun pattern! Who understands, I just might find a use for it In spite of everything.
In any case, I understood the two lbs of H4831SC employed exactly the same data, but I didn't know regardless of whether there was anything distinct amongst a pound of powder labeled "Excessive" and just one not so labeled. A get in touch with to Hodgdon confirmed they have been in actual fact similar and the only variance was the logo on the label.
I've utilized H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem with no variance. The only thing will be the limited Slice gives you a little bit more Room. Great luck!gun)
Anyone loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the outcome, any data you could share? Should also mention I have some ELD-X one hundred seventy five's I want to exam out, For those who have facts on that also.
Im underneath the understanding I choose to use h4831sc. I've go through that these powders are similar besides the shorter grain dimensions in the sc. Should really I nevertheless be on the lookout for h4381sc?
I could stack em in one hole but I wasn’t satisfied with the velocity. Right after months, I got Blessed and caught some H1000 on-line not to mention compensated a little added. The pretty future week at a gun exhibit a guy had an entire situation of H1000 for $40 for every 1lb. I neglect the amount of, but with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a delicate load.
locutus said: h4831 vs h4831sc I however have a great stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows by my powder steps effortlessly.
I have had similar encounter with H4350. For me, some ball powders would not shoot very well with anything except Fed215's. Some components just Will not play very well with other. Seems like you've picked three very good powders, I would assume at the very least one of them to shoot.
It is very likely h4831sc that no even more dialogue is necessary, by which situation we advise starting off a completely new thread. If on the other hand you're feeling your reaction is required you are able to even now achieve this.
I'm sure the H4831SC gives a much better load h4831sc load data density But I do think I have adequate home in my case for the normal H4831.
The truth that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is specifically why you're viewing larger velocities acquired with that powder, rather than That which you've found Along with the IMR stuff.